Participant feedback
Interaction design and media artist interview
—
Observational video
The observational video is password protected as per ethical approval received for this human research study. If you have been given a password for this material for examination purposes, you can access the observational video here.
—
Questionnaire feedback (Iteration 1)






—
Video cued recall (Iteration 2)
interviewer: Okay. So that’s the video that I have… whilst you’re in there. Um, _____, you’re welcome to tell me all your thoughts as well. You… um… did you have any thoughts about what you think was happening in there? (pause) Either of you? #00:00:40-9#
parent: Well we – was the peg supposed to be, um, creating different music according to where we put them? #00:00:48-7#
interviewer: Yeah. Yep. #00:00:50-4#
parent: So that was cool. So you… is… and the pegs also control what lights… #00:00:57-2#
interviewer: Yeah, that, uh, when it’s working properly. #00:01:00-2#
parent: Yeah, right, it’s… #00:01:01-2#
interviewer: So, the tent’s kind of divided up into segments. And on each of those segments there’s three lights. Um, and they’re represented by the holes in the, in the surface. #00:01:12-0#
parent: Yeah, okay. #00:01:12-9#
interviewer: Um, and… depending on the colour of the peg, that coloured light should come up. #00:01:19-2#
parent: Yeah, right, okay. #00:01:20-3#
interviewer: Um, but what’s happening is, the camera – there’s a camera inside that sees what colour is coming through. #00:01:27-3#
parent: Okay. #00:01:28-0#
interviewer: And it’s picking up the lights that are on the tent, rather than just the pegs… #00:01:32-2#
parent: Ohhh, yeah, sure, okay. #00:01:33-4#
interviewer: …and it kind of gets itself confused. #00:01:35-1#
parent: Yep, yep, yep, yep. That makes sense, because… (pause) yeah, cause I think, were you responding to the visual, Ru? Were you trying to make the lights come on and stuff? #00:01:49-2#
#00:01:45-4#
child: (incomprehensible) #00:01:51-3#
interviewer: Yeah. You seemed, um, quite excited when the lights came on the first time. #00:01:56-6#
parent: She didn’t really (incomprehensible) (laughing) #00:02:00-7#
interviewer: That’s fine (incomprehensible) (laughing) #00:02:05-8#
parent: I think she would’ve worked it out if it was all… working. #00:02:11-9#
interviewer: Yep. #00:02:12-2#
parent: Yep. Its, the sound was really pleasant in there. #00:02:16-7#
interviewer: Hmm? #00:02:17-3#
parent: Yeah, with like all of the… brook and it… was nice tinkling to listen to. Did you, what did you think? #00:02:25-5#
child: Good. #00:02:26-5#
parent: Yeah? #00:02:27-3#
interviewer: Did you feel comfortable in there? Or did it feel too small? #00:02:32-2#
child: I felt comfortable. #00:02:35-8#
interviewer: Okay. Um… _____ is diagnosed… #00:02:43-4#
parent: Yep; high-functioning autism. #00:02:45-2#
interviewer: High-functioning, okay. And attends mainstream school? #00:02:47-3#
parent: Yes. And, um, is about to be grade accelerated. #00:02:53-7#
interviewer: Okay. #00:02:54-9#
parent: So she’s up near that end of the spectrum. #00:02:58-3#
interviewer: Yep. And how’s school generally, is it… #00:03:02-6#
parent: Pretty tough. #00:03:03-3#
interviewer: Yeah? #00:03:03-6#
parent: Yep. #00:03:04-1#
interviewer: Okay. Just, um, from other kids, or, just doing sensory things? #00:03:10-4#
parent: Ahh, a combination of – I think when, when she’s not stimulated all the sensory stuff comes out. #00:03:17-7#
interviewer: Yep. #00:03:18-3#
parent: And um, heaps of other autistic symptoms come out when she’s not busy. So, and I think the social thing is becoming more, more noticeable. #00:03:32-2#
interviewer: Okay. #00:03:33-2#
parent: As she gets older. #00:03:35-1#
interviewer: Is there certain senses that, um, _____ prefers or doesn’t like? #00:03:41-2#
parent: Um. She’s very, got very sensitive ears. #00:03:47-2#
interviewer: Mmm hmm. #00:03:47-7#
parent: Rushing and (incomprehensible) so… um… her perception of space… um… yeah, sound and light I think are her biggest ones. #00:04:01-9#
interviewer: So, you, um… because it wasn’t working properly, a lot of the lights came on in there. _____, did you… was it too many lights that came on? #00:04:13-8#
child: No. #00:04:15-5#
parent: Yeah. (incomprehensible) #00:04:19-1#
interviewer: Okay. Did you see the lights inside the box? Through the holes? #00:04:24-4#
child: Yeah. #00:04:25-3#
interviewer: Was that light quite bright? #00:04:27-8#
child: (nodding) #00:04:28-7#
interviewer: Yeah. Yeah, I’ve had other people mention that the *type* of light that’s inside there is very kind of sharp… #00:04:36-2#
parent: Yeah, yeah. #00:04:36-2#
interviewer: …and, um, even though it’s kind of in there, it just, kind of, spotting it through the holes is sometimes a bit, bit much. #00:04:46-0#
parent: Bit jarring. #00:04:46-7#
interviewer: Yeah. #00:04:47-0#
parent: Yep. #00:04:47-7#
interviewer: Whereas the lights on the space is… #00:04:49-8#
parent: Really soft. #00:04:50-7#
interviewer: Yep. #00:04:50-9#
parent: Yeah. Yeah, see the lights didn’t bother her at all on the… on the tent. #00:04:56-2#
interviewer: Yep. #00:04:56-5#
parent: I could see that she was looking for a reaction. #00:05:01-3#
interviewer: Yeah. #00:05:02-2#
parent: Cause as soon as she got it, she’s like (incomprehensible)… #00:05:03-8#
interviewer: Yep. #00:05:04-4#
parent: (incomprehensible) #00:05:05-9#
interviewer: Yeah, it’s really frustrating it’s not working properly. #00:05:08-9#
parent: She kept trying though. #00:05:10-9#
interviewer: Yeah… Um, and what did you think of the pegs? Were they too rough, or…? #00:05:19-0#
child: They were too rough. #00:05:21-2#
interviewer: Yeah… (pause) Have you ever been inside a room like this before? #00:05:32-5#
child: (shaking head) #00:05:33-7#
interviewer: No sensory rooms or anything? #00:05:36-2#
parent: (incomprehensible) …public school system is a bit (incomprehensible) #00:05:42-0#
interviewer: Does _____ get any special classes or anything… #00:05:49-5#
parent: She’s got a teachers aid for two and a half hours a day. #00:05:52-5#
interviewer: Right. #00:05:53-1#
parent: Um. She doesn’t always get the teachers aid, because they pool the resources around the school. But um, yeah, that’s the support she gets. So, there a bit reactive rather than proactive, so they’ll wait until… you know, something happens, and then (incomprehensible) #00:06:13-1#
interviewer: Are there any sensory interventions, like fidgets or… #00:06:17-7#
parent: Um, when she was young we used a lot of stuff. We used, um, (incomprehensible) beads and, um… put her in the bath sometimes – we still do that – um, but nothing (incomprehensible) we use now those cushions to sit on, because discomfort – like physical discomfort – really sets her off. #00:06:42-8#
interviewer: Yep. She’s quite, sounds like quite tactile… #00:06:45-0#
parent: Yeah. So, sitting on the floor or a hard chair for long periods of time… hmm. #00:06:52-5#
interviewer: And so what did you think of that floor in there, _____? #00:06:55-6#
child: It was pretty good. #00:06:57-4#
interviewer: Yeah? It was a little bit softer than the concrete. #00:07:01-2#
parent: Was it, it was a bit squishy was it? #00:07:05-1#
interviewer: Yeah, it’s like those rubber mats. #00:07:06-7#
parent: Yep. #00:07:07-8#
interviewer: (long pause) Cool. Alright. Um, is there any other thoughts, or… questions? #00:07:25-2#
parent: Umm… that’s awesome. If it, if it reacts and everything… (laughing) #00:07:31-9#
interviewer: (laughing) #00:07:33-4#
parent: But I know you don’t want to hear that. But that’s amazing, cause it, she said, you know, it’s a little bit like a music puzzle. #00:07:39-1#
interviewer: Okay. #00:07:40-2#
parent: And that’s, yeah, you could – all the way through she was trying to work it out. #00:07:45-7#
interviewer: Yeah, yeah. #00:07:46-2#
parent: So that’s, um, the whole concept of it is really great. #00:07:49-7#
interviewer: The plan is, um, after this lot of studies I’ll try and fix all that stuff and if you’re interested to come back, we’ll do it one more time. #00:07:58-2#
parent: Yeah, okay. #00:07:59-1#
interviewer: Um, it would be nice to have you back (incomprehensible) #00:08:00-4#
parent: Yeah, sure. (laughing) #00:08:01-5#
interviewer: Um… #00:08:02-2#
parent: I think then, cause I’ve got this computer program at home where… she can basically design her own orchestra… and then write according to – it’s a bit blocky – but then choose the instrument and each one has it’s own different melody and stuff. And I think that’s what she was trying to do, she was trying to say, “well okay, this pile here makes that noise and that light”. Um, and I think it would be quite interesting if she could create something. #00:08:32-6#
interviewer: Um, does _____ use computers and iPads and things like that? #00:08:36-9#
parent: Yes. Yep. #00:08:38-0#
interviewer: Likes them? #00:08:38-4#
parent: Yeah. Very visual. And that’s quite soothing. But really responsive to sound as well, like, you know, gentle… that soundscape was really good. The… did you like the water? #00:08:51-9#
child: (nodding) #00:08:52-6#
parent: Yeah. Really soothing. And she’d (incomprehensible) the, the noises. Yeah. #00:08:58-8#
interviewer: Great. Okay, that’s excellent. Um, I’ll let you guys go. #00:09:06-7#
parent: Thank you. #00:09:07-1#
interviewer: Thank so much for (incomprehensible) #00:09:09-0#
parent: That’s alright. No worries. No worries. Good luck with it all. #00:09:12-5#
interviewer: Thanks. #00:09:13-3#
parent: Send me a message if you ever need us again. #00:09:15-7#
interviewer: I will hopefully in the next couple of months, I’ll do a final (incomprehensible) #00:09:19-8#
parent: Okay. Yep. #00:09:21-3#
interviewer: (incomprehensible) #00:09:37-9#
interviewer: I’ll get you to speak in response to this, if you think there was anything that was interesting about what happened in there, particularly if you think either the table or the space made any difference to _____’s interest or interaction with you – that would be particularly interesting. #00:00:41-2#
child: It is 9:41am in that. #00:00:41-7#
interviewer: I think it’s the wrong time. #00:00:43-4#
parent: I think it might be. #00:00:43-9#
child: Because we didn’t come in here at 9:41 in the morning. #00:00:54-0#
parent: I’m not sure what to say. #00:00:59-4#
interviewer: That’s alright. So, when you first went in, _____’s seemed to immediately understand the block and hole system. #00:01:08-3#
parent: Yep #00:01:08-5#
interviewer: So that as a mode of play is something he’s familiar with? #00:01:14-5#
parent: Um, yes, I don’t think that’s something we’ve done a lot at home. But yeah, _____ seemed to know exactly what to do with the blocks and seemed to want a bit of completion there and eventually he started looking for the missing blocks. #00:01:28-4#
interviewer: Yeah, I noticed that he mostly interested in filling all the holes and not necessarily the relationship between what was happening there and the lights. #00:01:39-3#
parent: No, yeah, he didn’t seem to notice that as much. Whereas I was wondering whether putting things in the blocks was triggering the lights. I think _____ was mostly focused on what was happening at the table – initially anyway. #00:01:55-8#
child: I thought let’s move the yellow ones, green ones, red ones all around. #00:02:06-7#
parent: Yeah, you enjoyed moving them around; stacking them on top of each other. #00:02:09-4#
child: Yeah. #00:02:11-4#
interviewer: And what did you think of the tent… #00:02:12-8#
child: I guess that’s camera three. (pointing at video). #00:02:16-9#
parent: I guess so, yeah. #00:02:15-6#
child: I’m putting the sound on. #00:02:19-0#
parent: Don’t touch it. #00:02:19-3#
interviewer: You can’t put the sound on that one. Do you think the tent space was nice to be inside, or did it not really make any difference? #00:02:31-1#
parent: Did you like the inside of the tent? #00:02:32-8#
child: Yup. #00:02:34-6#
parent: Yep? I thought it was a nice space. #00:02:36-6#
interviewer: And what about the lights? #00:02:40-2#
child: (laughing) #00:02:40-2#
parent: I liked how you were interested in finding out what was happening underneath there. #00:02:43-9#
child: Yeah. #00:02:43-4#
parent: You wanted to see how it works, huh? Um, yeah, I mean I found it quite a calm space, did you feel calm in there? #00:02:52-4#
child: Yep. #00:02:53-9#
parent: Yep? You looked pretty comfortable in there, like you weren’t worried about being in there at all, were you. #00:02:58-2#
child: Yeah. #00:02:58-3#
parent: Yeah, so you felt kind of calm and it allowed you to explore what was happening with the blocks and underneath the table? #00:03:07-0#
child: Yeah. #00:03:07-9#
parent: So it seemed to be a calm space. #00:03:11-2#
interviewer: So does _____ any particular sensory attraction or… (incomprehensible) #00:03:15-6#
parent: Yep. There are lots of different things, like a lot of oral… like he likes chewing and things. But, um, he doesn’t like really loud noises and crowds of people, so… #00:03:25-4#
child: Only – I only like me, my loud noises. #00:03:31-4#
parent: Yeah, you being loud is okay. Other people being loud around you, you don’t like that much. #00:03:35-1#
child: Yeah. #00:03:36-1#
parent: Yeah, yeah. So that was a nice space, wasn’t it? Cause there was a bit of noise, but it was nice and calm. #00:03:40-5#
child: Yeah, and very quiet. #00:03:43-4#
parent: And very quiet. #00:03:44-3#
child: Apart from when I was saying stuff. Because I, because there was a tiny bit of an echo in there. #00:03:54-8#
parent: There was a bit of an echo was there? #00:03:55-1#
child: Yeah. #00:03:56-1#
parent: Yep, yep. #00:03:56-4#
child: Tiny bit. #00:03:56-9#
parent: But yes, I think the space was a nice space for you to explore that toy? #00:04:04-2#
child: I guess… this would be camera four. (pointing at screen) #00:04:10-9#
interviewer: It would, if I had four cameras. But I only have three. #00:04:15-0#
child: Maybe you could buy another one. #00:04:21-2#
interviewer: (laughing) One day, when I have some more money. Has _____ been diagnosed by a therapist? #00:04:30-6#
parent: Yes, by a psychologist – a clinical psychologist. #00:04:33-3#
interviewer: Okay. Um… he’s high functioning. #00:04:35-4#
parent: Yep. #00:04:36-7#
interviewer: Is he in mainstream school? #00:04:37-9#
parent: Yep. #00:04:38-9#
interviewer: Okay. And do you find that experience… (incomprehensible) #00:04:44-2#
parent: Um… Been a bit difficult. We changed schools – he was in Kindy last year, and now he’s in Year 1 this year – we changed schools because the class was, like he was in a class with 60 students, because they had all the year in one room, but 2 teachers. He’s now in a public school where there is only 24 kids in the class and a teacher’s aid for half the day. And he’s fine in there, he’s yeah – but the noise is difficult for him. Noise and crowds of people, so he’s had his earphones kind of… (incomprehensible) #00:05:17-9#
interviewer: Okay. And if… #00:05:19-6#
parent: So, yeah, school’s been difficult. #00:05:22-2#
interviewer: If you didn’t have the earphones with you, what would _____’s response be? #00:05:28-2#
parent: Um, he’d probably need breaks. Yeah, like last year he spent more time out of the classroom. #00:05:36-0#
child: (incomprehensible) #00:05:38-8#
parent: …it was just bit too much. Too many people. #00:05:45-0# #00:05:42-2#
child: (incomprehensible) #00:05:43-7#
parent: So yeah, he doesn’t seem particularly hyper – or hypo – sensitive to visual stimuli… (incomprehensible) #00:05:57-0#
interviewer: _____, what did you think about the wooden blocks? Do they… are they… do you like playing with those sorts of things? #00:06:03-7#
child: Let me just pause it. (pausing video) #00:06:06-4#
interviewer: Okay. #00:06:08-2#
child: And I’m just going to get one of those blocks… (going into study room to get block) (incomprehensible) #00:06:17-2#
child: You mean these blocks? #00:06:28-1#
interviewer: Yeah, how does it feel? #00:06:28-9#
parent: (incomprehensible) #00:06:31-8#
child: Almost like it feels like a little bit bitey on the top and the sides here, and the bottom here and here is pretty much flat. #00:06:44-6#
interviewer: Yes. #00:06:45-9#
child: Apart from this hole. #00:06:47-7#
parent: Yep. #00:06:48-9#
interviewer: So you don’t like the rough sides so much? #00:06:51-4#
child: Yeah. (incomprehensible) #00:06:56-1#
parent: You like the smooth side better? #00:06:56-5#
child: Yeah. #00:06:56-6#
parent: Yep. #00:06:57-9#
child: Also I found out that these blocks were actually making those lights. #00:07:06-7#
interviewer: Oh, you noticed that they were making the lights! #00:07:09-4#
child: Yeah. #00:07:09-5#
interviewer: Great. Do you have a favourite colour out of the blocks? #00:07:14-9#
child: (holding yellow block) #00:07:14-6#
interviewer: Yellow? #00:07:16-5#
child: Yeah, that’s why I picked this one. #00:07:19-7#
parent: Uh huh. #00:07:20-0#
interviewer: Okay. #00:07:20-1#
child: A yellow one. #00:07:22-3#
parent: Let’s play again? (laughing) #00:07:29-4#
interviewer: Um.. that’s great. Do you have any questions about what happened or any thoughts? #00:07:37-1#
parent: No, I thought it was a good space because I guess that’s the only things he could focus on. #00:07:43-1#
child: I think you should get two more blocks. #00:07:46-2#
interviewer: To fill all the holes? #00:07:47-7#
child: Yeah. #00:07:48-1#
interviewer: Yeah, I should probably get some more blocks. I’ll get them when I get the other camera. #00:07:51-7#
child: Yeah. A fourth camera. #00:07:54-4#
interviewer: Fourth camera. #00:07:55-1#
parent: Uh huh. Yep, did you like being in that space? #00:07:59-5#
child: (nodding) #00:07:59-9#
parent: Mmm hmm? It was a calm space to be? #00:08:02-7#
child: I guess it… (incomprehensible) is an ‘x’, but when I’m not touching that I never know what… (incomprehensible) means. #00:08:13-7#
interviewer: With the what thing? #00:08:15-7#
child: The green. (pointing at video on laptop screen) #00:08:17-0#
interviewer: Alright, push the green on there, I think it makes it full screen. _____, do you have any suggestions about how the space would be better or more fun? #00:08:29-8#
child: Mmm, getting a full block. Like, a square block. #00:08:36-8#
interviewer: Yeah? #00:08:37-8#
child: Like there has been in one of the videos that I have watched. #00:08:42-4#
interviewer: Ahh yes, yep. You prefer the square blocks better do you? #00:08:46-9#
child: Yeah. Do you have any of those? #00:08:50-6#
interviewer: I don’t. #00:08:52-0#
child: I think you should buy some of them. #00:08:55-7#
interviewer: (laughing) #00:08:56-7#
parent: (laughing) You like the square blocks that you saw in the picture? #00:08:58-0#
child: Yeah. #00:08:58-7#
parent: Uh huh. #00:08:58-7#
interviewer: Yeah, they were pretty cool. #00:08:59-5#
child: I’ll just deliver this one back. (holding up a block) #00:09:02-9#
interviewer: Okay. #00:09:03-1#
parent: You’re going to put it back in there? (pointing to the study room) Okay. #00:09:06-0#
parent: So have you got the audio, or just the video? (pointing to video) #00:00:12-8#
interviewer: There is audio on there as well. #00:00:15-0#
parent: Look, who’s that? (pointing to video) #00:00:16-0#
child: _____. #00:00:17-8#
interviewer: So, when he first went in, there was obviously just the general interest in the object. #00:00:30-5#
parent: Yep. #00:00:31-9#
interviewer: And, uh, wooden blocks and those sorts of things – are they a toy that _____ would usually play with? #00:00:40-7#
parent: He loves fitting things, like fitting things in something else. Like, if he finds a plastic tube somewhere, he’s going to find somewhere that he can slot it. Like, it’s… he loves this kind of thing. Like, finding things that connect to each other. Yeah, so that’s why he was really into this. And yeah, wooden toys he, he does play a lot with wooden toys at school and at home, right _____? You like your wooden toys. But see how he’s, like, he puts it down and then he looks around? #00:01:17-4#
interviewer: Yeah. #00:01:17-5#
parent: Like he knows – he knew pretty much instantly that there was a connection between the two things. And he was kind of trying to figure it out actually, like, and as I said before, I was thinking, I don’t know if he sees the connection in colour, like whether the connection he sees is colour connection or it’s the space connection. But then when he said – because I didn’t tell him anything – and he – _____! (_____ pushing on laptop) – he tried the, umm, the blue one he loved the blue light… #00:01:54-9#
child: (incomprehensible) #00:01:57-3#
parent: You know how he begins… hang on, let me just see if we can… yeah, the blue light came on and he, it was… #00:02:02-3#
child: (pushing on laptop) #00:02:01-6#
parent: _____! No, no, no – ahh, you’re going to break the computer! #00:02:04-6#
child: (laughing) #00:02:05-4#
parent: Here _____, I’ll let you hold that, cause otherwise he going to smash your computer. Umm, see yeah, when it comes on, it’s like “ahh!”… #00:02:14-6# #00:02:16-0# #00:02:14-1#
interviewer: Yeah. #00:02:15-7#
child: (incomprehensible) #00:02:16-0#
parent: It’s the only one that’s different to all the others. #00:02:17-7#
interviewer: Okay. #00:02:19-2#
parent: Blue is not usually his favourite colour of all. But, because it was the one that was different from all the others, he really noticed it. And, that’s when, like, there’s a – you can see that there’s like, there’s definitely a correlation in the colour, like he realised that the blue thing was the blue – there was a correlation between the two. And then when it stopped working, it just confirmed that for me, because I thought further on, I thought that he’d forgotten the colour correlation between the light and the object, but when he started saying “oh, the blue one can’t work – it doesn’t work”, then I realised that he hadn’t forgotten, that the things had a link somehow. #00:03:07-4#
interviewer: Do you think he understood a spatial link, or just that… #00:03:12-0#
parent: I’m not sure… #00:03:13-4#
interviewer: …that he was having some affect #00:03:15-9#
parent: Some, but I don’t think that it was completely clear. Not the spatial link. #00:03:21-5#
interviewer: Yep. #00:03:23-1#
parent: Umm, definitely the colour, but I’m not sure about the spatial link. But, maybe if you look through, you know, that’s just a feeling of mine, but you might need to look more closely at the video, because it might be that actually he did know what was going on. But I did find that I had to… #00:03:41-2#
child: Come on mum. #00:03:41-2#
parent: …I did find that I had to, sort of, show him sometimes, that he was looking down a lot and he wasn’t looking behind at, yep. #00:03:52-2#
child: (incomprehensible) #00:03:53-7#
parent: Oh, you want to go back to it. (motioning toward study room) Oh, _____ it’s finished now, so we’ll come back again soon. #00:04:01-7#
child: (incomprehensible) #00:04:02-7#
parent: (laughing) #00:04:04-8#
interviewer: Umm, did you have any other general thoughts about (incomprehensible) #00:04:07-9#
parent: Umm, definitely works better this way than last time. Umm, just because there is a task that’s clear. Like, the object, straight away he could see the correlation between the shape (incomprehensible) #00:04:22-8#
child: (incomprehensible) #00:04:24-2#
parent: (incomprehensible) …because before it was so abstract for him (incomprehensible) #00:04:34-7#
child: (incomprehensible) #00:04:32-7#
parent: And instead of trying (incomprehensible) he made his own sense of it last time and it didn’t quite work (incomprehensible) #00:04:43-2#
child: (incomprehensible) #00:04:45-4#
parent: Oh _____, we can’t open that, it’s all finished now, we’ve turned it off. #00:04:48-7#
child: No, turn it on! #00:04:50-7#
parent: (laughing) #00:04:51-5#
interviewer: (laughing) Alright… #00:04:53-2#
parent: We’re gonna come again soon though, we’ll come back again and do this again soon, okay? #00:04:56-7#
child: Turn it on again… #00:04:58-9#
parent: But we’re going to, soon going to meet (incomprehensible) #00:05:01-9#
(incomprehensible) (setting up laptop for interview) #00:00:12-1#
interviewer: Okay, so, what I use the video for is just kind of like a talking point and if you saw anything that you think was interesting (incomprehensible) or sort of jolts your memory, that would be handy. But, just generally, what did you think about… how it worked this time, compared to last time? #00:00:35-5#
respondent: (incomprehensible) #00:00:38-6#
interviewer: Both of you. #00:00:40-3#
respondent: Oh, both of us? #00:00:41-5#
interviewer: Yep. #00:00:41-5#
respondent: What do you think, _____? Did you like it this time, or last time better? #00:00:44-7#
child: (incomprehensible) there was purple. #00:00:50-7#
respondent: You liked purple? #00:00:52-2#
interviewer: (laughing) #00:00:52-3#
respondent: Yeah, there wasn’t any purple. #00:00:53-6#
interviewer: Yeah, there wasn’t as many colours this time. #00:00:54-8#
respondent: What else, what else about it? #00:00:56-7#
child: Umm… (pause) (incomprehensible) #00:01:08-8#
respondent: Did you like the blocks, or did you like the squares last time? Did you like the little peggy things, or did you like the squares? #00:01:15-6#
child: The little peggy things. #00:01:17-5#
respondent: You liked the peggy things. #00:01:18-5#
interviewer: Do you have other toys that are a bit like that – wooden blocks and things? No? #00:01:25-2#
respondent: Not any more. You’re probably a bit too old for these now. Are you? (incomprehensible) But it was nice, wasn’t it? It was easier to see the colours in the other prototype than these, this one. As in, of the blocks. #00:01:45-0#
interviewer: Do you mean the connection between what you were doing? #00:01:48-6#
respondent: No, it was hard to see the colours of the pegs, wasn’t it? #00:01:51-3#
interviewer: Ahh, okay. #00:01:52-3#
respondent: It was a bit dark. Whereas before, it was easier to see the colours on the cubes. Yeah? #00:01:57-7#
interviewer: Okay. #00:01:58-3#
respondent: And the matching, the matching game of the other, of the cubes was a little bit clearer, wasn’t it? But the pegs were nice? (talking to child) (incomprehensible) down the hole, didn’t you? (laughing) #00:02:12-4#
interviewer: (pause) Um, what did you think of the floor this time? #00:02:20-7#
respondent: Did you like the floor? #00:02:22-2#
interviewer: Did you notice it – no? That’s okay. Do you think anything could be changed to make it better? More purple? #00:02:32-0#
respondent: (laughing) Don’t know. I don’t remember the floor last time actually. #00:02:38-0#
interviewer: It was basically just a concrete floor. #00:02:39-9#
respondent: Oh, was it. Was it more comfortable before? #00:02:41-8#
child: Mmmm… (pause) Mum? #00:02:51-0#
respondent: Mmm. #00:02:51-5#
child: (incomprehensible) #00:02:56-4#
respondent: (laughing) Yeah, I’ve got a pen in my bag. #00:02:57-9#
child: Now! #00:02:59-6#
respondent: So tell me, _____… #00:03:01-7#
child: (incomprehensible) #00:03:03-8#
respondent: I’ll, I’ll, I’ll have a look. You just talk to _____ about what you’ve seen. Did you enjoy that? Yeah? Would you like to do it again? #00:03:12-4#
interviewer: Do you, did you find it relaxing or exciting? #00:03:17-2#
respondent: Was it, was it, did it make you excited, _____? Or just, it was just fun? #00:03:23-2#
child: It was just fun. #00:03:24-7#
respondent: Yeah. #00:03:25-3#
child: (incomprehensible) went bowling yesterday. #00:03:28-5#
respondent: You went bowling. Yes you did. Was it as exciting as bowling? #00:03:33-0#
child: Ummmmm… #00:03:35-3#
respondent: Maybe not so much. #00:03:36-9#
interviewer: (incomprehensible) bowling is pretty exciting. #00:03:39-2#
respondent: Here, _____. Here’s a pencil. Do you (incomprehensible) this pencil? #00:03:44-2#
child: (incomprehensible) pencil. #00:03:47-4#
respondent: It is. Try it. I’ll get the notebook. So yeah, what else, _____. Any other things you’d like to tell _____? #00:03:57-1#
child: (incomprehensible) #00:03:58-2#
interviewer: So mainly you thought that it was easier to understand last time? #00:04:02-5#
respondent: Can you look at _____ when he’s talking to you? #00:04:07-4#
child: I’m not sure. #00:04:11-3#
respondent: You’re not sure. #00:04:12-6#
interviewer: That’s okay. #00:04:13-9#
respondent: Perhaps it was a bit less clear what we meant to do. #00:04:16-4#
interviewer: Yeah. #00:04:16-7#
respondent: Um, but yeah. Uhhh… the colour connection seemed clearer last time. But we just seemed to get a lot of red. #00:04:28-6#
child: (incomprehensible) #00:04:29-7#
respondent: (laughing) Um, but, yeah, so, I think it took her a little while to realise that they weren’t the same number – that it was okay that there wasn’t the same number of pegs as holes. And then to move stuff around. #00:04:46-7#
interviewer: Yep. #00:04:47-1#
respondent: So, that’s um, I think there’s an assumption with peg games that you just complete it and then it ends. So, that’s, that’s the only thing with that one. #00:04:55-9#
interviewer: Yeah, which is why I did have some missing. #00:04:57-9#
respondent: Yeah, yeah, yeah. That’s right, so you kind of – um… but then I think… she did start to experiment and move the pegs around and try group them – she did the colour grouping thing – but that didn’t have a huge effect, so I think she gave up on that one. Um… yeah. #00:05:21-3#
child: We put them together. #00:05:22-8#
respondent: Mmm hmm, yeah? #00:05:24-5#
child: And then the colour came. #00:05:26-7#
respondent: Mmm, and the colours, yeah. And you found some pink. #00:05:30-7#
child: Yeah. #00:05:32-1#
respondent: And green. #00:05:32-6#
child: Yes. It was green. #00:05:35-2#
respondent: You ticked green. Yeah, you made a list. Um, yeah. (incomprehensible) #00:05:42-0#
interviewer: Okay. #00:05:43-1#
respondent: I don’t know how useful that is. (laughing) #00:05:45-4#
interviewer: No, that’s great. It’s, um… hamstrung by (incomprehensible) #00:05:49-2#
respondent: Ohhh, so what was the – how did it work? So the pegs sort of… #00:05:53-0#
interviewer: Umm… #00:05:53-7#
respondent: Does it register the colour of the pegs? #00:05:55-8#
interviewer: Yeah, pretty much a one to one relationship, so… #00:05:58-1#
respondent: Ohhh, okay, right, right. #00:05:59-2#
interviewer: Umm, it’s kind of divided up into segments – the tent – and onto the surface. #00:06:03-2#
respondent: Right, right. #00:06:03-9#
interviewer: So one red peg should give you one red light there. #00:06:06-1#
respondent: Ohhh. #00:06:07-2#
interviewer: But you kind of put one red peg in and all this red light (incomprehensible) #00:06:10-1#
respondent: Yes, yes, that’s right. #00:06:11-2#
interviewer: …all becomes red. #00:06:12-0#
respondent: Yes, I see. Yeah, that’s an issue. #00:06:14-9#
child: Mum, can we go to your office. Then we’ll get a pen. #00:06:19-1#
respondent: No, no pen in my office. There’s never a pen, no there’s nothing in my office, so go for a walk…
parent: We’re just going to talk just quick about it, and follow this, so you’ll be recording yeah? #00:00:06-8#
interviewer: Yeah. #00:00:07-5#
parent: Um, so I thought the objects were really nice. #00:00:13-2#
child: I saw blue. #00:00:14-1#
parent: Did you some blue? I thought it was very, well less enigmatic than last time I suppose as objects- #00:00:22-0#
child: Through blues. #00:00:23-1#
interviewer: It was clear as a task? #00:00:27-1#
parent: Maybe not, I mean I have to say I still found the relationship between what we were doing and the colours and the timing… too… I couldn’t draw the connections. Um, and we tried different options- #00:00:44-2#
child: Scorpions. #00:00:45-2#
parent: Like what was intriguing while there was one, there was one, only one blue, pink or why there wasn’t a complete set, so I kept trying to think of that, those things. Um, so it still just felt quite… loose, I suppose, as experience, but still I really liked the blocks and the physicality of the… Now, like that’s the kids really- #00:01:12-8#
child: Hey look two blues- #00:01:13-4#
parent: Yeah, yeah, that was two blues. The kids really relate to (incomprehensible) Oh there’s blue, yeah, (incomprehensible)… Blue didn’t turn up very much, so we couldn’t work out why. #00:01:26-4#
interviewer: You seem to have a few ideas, and then _____ you’re trying a few different things? #00:01:30-2#
parent: Yeah, what were you trying _____? #00:01:31-6#
child: I kind of thought that if you um… (pause) left the, ones in one position too long um, all the lights would go out. That’s why I thought, yeah, so I moved them around. #00:02:06-9#
parent: Yeah, moved them around. We sometimes, even when there was, when we took them all out, the lights stayed on still for quite a while didn’t they? #00:02:16-9#
child: Yes. #00:02:18-4#
interviewer: What do you think about using the pegs instead of the blocks from last time? #00:02:24-8#
parent: Yeah, what did you think _____? #00:02:25-9#
child: You can see the paper crane in every picture, but in that picture it’s behind the tail, it’s behind my foot, so you can see in that picture it’s (incomprehensible) it was behind my foot. #00:02:43-3#
parent: Okay but let’s get back to _____’s questions. _____ asked what did you think about using the pegs this time compared to the blocks last time? What did you think? #00:02:52-2#
child: Um, you think if you use… Okay, so if you use the pegs there are more colours and you hurry… #00:03:05-5#
parent: Yeah, you liked the bang-bang side of it, didn’t you? #00:03:10-6#
child: Yeah? #00:03:10-8#
parent: Fitting them in? #00:03:11-8#
child: Yeah, bang-bang side of it. #00:03:14-5#
interviewer: Do you have many toys at home and they’re wooden blocks and (incomprehensible)… #00:03:19-3#
child: I have a whole giant container of wooden blocks. #00:03:26-7#
interviewer: That sounds familiar. #00:03:27-7#
parent: Yeah, we enjoy the blocks: dominoes and big towers. #00:03:35-0#
interviewer: Just aside from the interaction system just as an object, that seems to be a lot more clear? #00:03:47-9#
parent: Yeah, because I guess when I think back to the previous ones, they were interesting just to look at, but the idea… by putting a certain face down, that that was the communicating thing, in this case it’s much clearer the relationship, rather than (incomprehensible)… #00:04:10-0#
child: Look what I can make it look like! This is what I can make it like. #00:04:15-6#
parent: Yes. And um, I certainly think that, like he was really happy to be there for a long time, so he was happy exploring um, and trying different options. So that was good, as well. #00:04:33-6#
interviewer: So even though it wasn’t working the way that you expected, it was clear that something was happening? #00:04:39-9#
parent: Yeah it was clear that something was responsive. Um, I just couldn’t work it out. And I think as well… maybe it also depends where you’re sitting. Like the pink on the left of where I was sitting, um, maybe some of the colour differentia- I don’t know. Like that one, it just, you could obviously interpret it as the same as the red but slightly distant. So the blue and the red are very opposed, and then is there a green and a yellow? #00:05:14-0#
interviewer: There should be yeah. #00:05:15-1#
parent: Yeah, see I, there’s not… Or at least maybe because red was our dominant experience and so other than the blue, the other ones I couldn’t quite feel… Maybe it was because they’re strongly, like I was recognising them as distinct colours. I mean the pale green, yes I think, but we only saw that once. Yeah, so what was going on? #00:05:44-3#
interviewer: So… I think the way that it should work is the way that you’re expecting it to work. It’s basically one-to-one relationship between the colour and the position of the peg and the lights, yeah, and it’s divided up into the segments that you mentioned, that’s been broken down into a hexagon. Um, but what is happening with the camera inside is that it seems to be shifting its exposure level constantly. It won’t lock down. And then it sees red coming through those holes and then that just seems to fill its entire field of vision and the whole thing turns red and it becomes this feedback loop. #00:06:26-9#
parent: Of course, yeah, okay. #00:06:29-5#
interviewer: Yeah. I think I need to actually rebuild that surface so light doesn’t come through the holes. #00:06:38-6#
parent: Does that mean, because I was thinking about the variables, so the colour of the peg is one variable, its position on the desk is another. Is there any timing factor? #00:06:52-5#
interviewer: It should be basically instantaneous. #00:06:55-0#
parent: Right, and so if you were to take the pegs out? #00:06:57-5#
interviewer: The light would go off. #00:06:58-8#
parent: What happens if in one segment you end up with the yellow, red and green pair? #00:07:05-5#
interviewer: Then you should see a yellow, red and a green light. #00:07:07-6#
parent: In that area too? Oh right yeah. #00:07:11-2#
interviewer: And I think what- #00:07:14-6#
parent: So that would explain then why even when we started off with the blue, and then even when we tried to repeat what had initially triggered the blue because of this um, recursive problem, it just wasn’t, yeah. #00:07:29-7#
interviewer: Yeah, and what you were talking about the pink [crosstalk 00:07:35] further away, that’s exactly what it was. Each lighting stand has got three lights and the one that’s the top, because the lighting stand is very cool and the tent surface angled, the top one is actually at a greater distance away. #00:07:50-5#
parent: Okay, but it is a pink? #00:07:51-7#
interviewer: It’s a red. #00:07:52-6#
parent: Oh it’s a red. #00:07:53-2#
interviewer: But just because of that greater distance that you get, its intensity drops a little bit. #00:07:57-5#
parent: Is that intentional? #00:07:59-0#
interviewer: No, it was kind of an effort to stop that light coming in because of that height, so I tilted them more and they’re coming onto the surface directly. You get more distance and less intensity. #00:08:18-7#
parent: Yeah. It could be interpreted as another variable, of reconstructed the light I guess. When you’re in the tent you experience some as really bright and some as gentle and more marginal. Yeah I like… That’s interesting. So ee have been right. What he was going through with trying to get reactions on the surfaces was the plan? #00:08:53-1#
interviewer: Yeah, that’s really interesting to see the way that he tried to get meaning out of what was happening, trying different things even though the system wasn’t working as it’s supposed to. That’s a really interesting behaviour for me to, you know what I’m saying? #00:09:11-0#
parent: Yeah totally, because it didn’t matter because he was still like “ooo, let’s try this”. They develop a patience in a way with that… Yeah, or a lot more faith that there will be direction. Can you [crosstalk 00:09:25]. #00:09:25-5#
child: [crosstalk 00:09:25] freckles. #00:09:28-2#
parent: Yeah you do have a lot of freckles. Yeah, so have you had autistic kids in? #00:09:34-6#
interviewer: I’ve had two. One was this [crosstalk 00:09:37]. #00:09:37-9#
child: Now, if everything moves fuzzy. Why is everything fuzzy, a bit fuzzy? #00:09:44-5#
interviewer: Let’s just stop the audio. #00:09:45-6#
parent: Right, yeah. Sorry, yeah did we answer? Did we give you enough? #00:09:48-4#
interviewer: Yeah that’s fantastic, yeah. That’s really good. #00:09:50-9#
—
Video cued recall (Iteration 3)
interviewer: This is the video of you guys in there, just now. What did you think the tent this time, compared to last time, _____? #00:00:18-6#
child: It was a bit better. #00:00:20-4#
interviewer: A bit better? #00:00:21-2#
child: Yeah. #00:00:22-0#
interviewer: Yeah? What did you like about it this time? #00:00:24-2#
child: I liked that the colours changed. And um, it got back to one, and it didn’t go blank again. #00:00:33-1#
interviewer: So you liked that the lights didn’t go out? #00:00:36-3#
child: Yeah. #00:00:37-0#
interviewer: Okay. Um, you seemed to really like playing musical notes and finding the patterns in there. #00:00:48-6#
child: Yeah. #00:00:49-6#
interviewer: Um, was there any time that you thought that it wasn’t working properly? #00:00:53-8#
child: No. #00:00:54-9#
interviewer: No, it was always working the way it should? Um, this object with the buttons on it – did you recognise it as being anything in particular, or just a shape with buttons on it? #00:01:14-2#
child: It looked like an, uh, an igloo. #00:01:19-0#
interviewer: Yeah? And so, did you think that by pressing any particular buttons certain lights came on? #00:01:30-7#
child: Yeah. #00:01:31-8#
interviewer: Yeah? (pause) If there was anything in there… If you could make it do anything that you wanted, in the tent, what would you like to happen? #00:01:47-3#
child: I would like it to be any colour. #00:01:50-4#
interviewer: Okay, not just the 3 colours, more colours. #00:01:54-5#
child: And um, yeah, I would like it to be all the colours, if it could. #00:02:03-7#
interviewer: Mmm hmm. And would you want to control that with buttons or something else? Last time we had wooden pegs that went in holes. #00:02:13-8#
child: Buttons. #00:02:15-1#
interviewer: Buttons are better? #00:02:15-9#
child: Yeah. #00:02:16-6#
interviewer: Yeah? (pause) Did you think there was a right or a wrong way to use it, or it didn’t really matter, you could do whatever you like? #00:02:29-6#
child: It didn’t really matter. #00:02:31-0#
interviewer: Okay. And what did you think this time around? #00:02:38-6#
parent: Oh it was great. #00:02:39-5#
interviewer: Yeah? #00:02:40-3#
parent: Yeah, the buttons are really fun, I think. Um, and yeah, they responded to such a… she was able to work out patterns, pretty quickly. I think it’s good. #00:02:55-6#
interviewer: Did you think that it was working properly the whole time? #00:03:00-6#
parent: Um, I noticed that the colours represented the colour on the button, but then in one section they didn’t. #00:03:09-8#
interviewer: Mmm hmm. #00:03:10-5#
parent: Um, I wasn’t sure whether that was intended or not, to break it up a bit. Um, yeah. I don’t know, was that intentional? #00:03:20-7#
interviewer: So the way that I’ve designed it, this time, was at first it should respond to colour and then over time, also position, as well. #00:03:31-1#
parent: Right, yeah. #00:03:32-0#
interviewer: So that object in the middle is the tent that you’re inside, which is a bit abstract because you’re inside and outside. #00:03:39-1#
parent: Yeah, yeah, yeah. That’s awesome, though. #00:03:41-3#
interviewer: Um, but eventually, it became random. #00:03:44-8#
parent: Yeah. #00:03:45-6#
interviewer: I was interested in what happens when it stops representing what’s going on. It was designed to kind of go (incomprehensible)… #00:03:56-3#
parent: Do that, yeah. I don’t um, I know if she worked that out, I’m not sure. #00:04:03-6#
interviewer: Not many people do, there’s no right or wrong… #00:04:07-9#
parent: No, no. And I think it was really enjoyable um, when she could, sort of, control what was happening. #00:04:14-4#
interviewer: Yeah. #00:04:14-7#
parent: You had fun, yeah? We were making songs together, so she wanted my direction this time. #00:04:23-2#
interviewer: Yeah, that was great. #00:04:24-1#
parent: Which was interesting. And I think because it made so much more sense to her, so that she had… felt like she had that little bit of control. #00:04:32-0#
interviewer: It’s a lot more instantaneous than the last one, which wasn’t working properly, anyway, but buttons are just dead-on in that way, which I think seems to help. #00:04:41-6#
parent: Yeah, it does. Immediately engaging. #00:04:43-5#
interviewer: Um, I had my 18-month-old in here the other day, he just went straight to it and pressed buttons. #00:04:51-8#
parent: Yeah. #00:04:52-1#
interviewer: He didn’t get it, but he knew that the buttons did something. #00:04:55-5#
parent: Yeah, that’s what was… yeah. #00:04:56-1#
interviewer: Um, I think it went well. #00:04:58-8#
parent: Mmm. #00:04:59-7#
interviewer: Did you like the sound this time, _____? #00:05:03-9#
child: Yeah. #00:05:04-5#
interviewer: Yeah? (pause) Um… you said you would like more colours, was the light… Did you like the colours that were in there, or were they too bright? Were they not the kind of colours that you like? #00:05:18-2#
child: Well um, red was one of my favourite colours. #00:05:23-4#
interviewer: Yeah? #00:05:24-2#
parent: Was it too bright in there, or it was okay? #00:05:27-0#
child: It was really okay. #00:05:28-5#
parent: Was it? (pause) Were you bothered by the light at all? #00:05:36-1#
child: No. #00:05:37-0#
parent: It was nicely muted, I think. Muted enough so it wasn’t right in the face. #00:05:44-3#
interviewer: It’s definitely brighter than last time. #00:05:46-6#
parent: Is it really? #00:05:47-3#
interviewer: Yeah. #00:05:47-8#
parent: Yeah, okay. #00:05:48-3#
interviewer: U, which I was a bit concerned, but… #00:05:51-5#
parent: It didn’t bother her, she’s quite happy. #00:05:54-5#
interviewer: Yeah. Great. #00:05:58-4#
parent: Mmm. #00:05:59-2#
interviewer: Okay. Well, that’s… Did you… Is there anything else that you wanted to say about it? (pause) No? (laughing) Okay, well, I’ll let you guys go and enjoy the cold. #00:06:16-9#
parent: It’s horrible. #00:06:18-0#
interviewer: Yeah, it’s very cold. What are you up to for the rest of the day? #00:06:22-4#
parent: I’m not sure today. Her dad’s home, so we’ll probably just… #00:06:26-3#
parent: Why don’t you sit over here? #00:00:06-2#
interviewer: All right. This is the video of you in here just now. (pause) There you are. #00:00:15-5#
child: (laughing) #00:00:19-1#
interviewer: When you first went in, you went around and pressed all the buttons… #00:00:27-8#
child: Yeah. #00:00:28-5#
interviewer: …a few times. Is that because you like the lights or the sound? #00:00:32-5#
child: It was just seeing what buttons there were and I just worked on those three. #00:00:40-8#
interviewer: Ah. Okay. So when you stopped going around you just decided to work on three? #00:00:47-1#
child: Yeah. #00:00:47-7#
interviewer: Okay. Did you like this one better than the last time you were here? #00:00:54-8#
child: This one’s better. #00:00:57-3#
interviewer: Yeah? Why’s that? #00:01:01-2#
child: Because there was buttons! #00:01:04-6#
interviewer: You like buttons? Yeah. Buttons seem to be a winner. (laughing) Um, what about colours? The lights? #00:01:11-1#
child: (incomprehensible) #00:01:13-5#
interviewer: They are quite bright and they change quickly. Do you like that? #00:01:18-9#
child: Yeah. Plus when I did rapid fire it was quite funny. #00:01:24-1#
interviewer: Yeah. They do move very quickly. #00:01:26-0#
child: Rapid fire. Rapid fire. #00:01:30-5#
interviewer: Um, that thing in the middle with all the buttons on it, did you… #00:01:34-4#
child: Can we put on sound? #00:01:36-5#
interviewer: Oh there’s no sound for that one. #00:01:37-9#
child: Why? #00:01:38-7#
interviewer: Umm… that’s a good question. (laughing) Don’t know, but there’s just not. Um, that thing in the middle with all the buttons on it, did you recognise it as being anything in particular or just something… #00:01:57-3#
child: Just an igloo. #00:01:58-6#
interviewer: An igloo? Okay. Did you think it was the igloo that you were inside? #00:02:03-3#
child: Yeah. #00:02:04-9#
interviewer: Yeah. So, um, did… #00:02:09-7#
child: There was actually three… lights outside which was like exactly the same. #00:02:20-0#
interviewer: As the buttons? #00:02:21-2#
child: Yeah. #00:02:21-6#
interviewer: Yeah. #00:02:22-2#
child: So like, the buttons were the light, the igloo was the tent and that was the floor. And this was the floor! #00:02:35-4#
interviewer: Yup. #00:02:36-5#
child: I just needed to do it on that picture. Cause all the other one’s just had it covered up. #00:02:47-2#
interviewer: And what did you think about the tent this time? #00:02:51-5#
parent: Yeah. It’s good, very enthusiastic about it. #00:02:54-9#
child: The igloo. #00:02:55-6#
parent: He’s very excited. He’s much more excited I guess this time than last time. #00:02:58-9#
interviewer: Yeah. #00:02:59-5#
parent: And he wanted to stay a lot longer. #00:03:01-6#
interviewer: Yeah. #00:03:02-4#
parent: Um, and was experimenting a lot. I think he saw the connection more between the button and the light (incomprehensible) in the box. #00:03:11-1#
interviewer: Yeah. Yeah. And there was… #00:03:12-8#
child: And it was… And that and the floor are really similar in there. #00:03:21-7#
interviewer: Similar? #00:03:22-6#
child: Yeah. #00:03:23-2#
interviewer: Yeah. #00:03:23-9#
child: So really all you needed to do is do little black lines behind them and it would really be the same. #00:03:36-9#
interviewer: Okay. Same as the floor. #00:03:39-3#
child: And you on the computer of course. #00:03:42-3#
interviewer: (laughing) #00:03:43-5#
parent: So you think he needs to… (laughing) #00:03:46-3#
interviewer: There are some times that you’re asking your mom to press buttons at the same time as you. #00:03:51-8#
child: Yeah. #00:03:52-6#
interviewer: What were you trying to do? #00:03:53-4#
child: I was trying to see what happens if more buttons were pressed at the same time. #00:04:05-2#
parent: He seemed much more curious about… Oh he was curious about the last one, but this one much more, you know, wanting to walk around the tent. #00:04:16-7#
interviewer: Yeah, it was like he, kind of, solved it very quickly last time and it was… #00:04:21-4#
parent: Yeah. Yeah. #00:04:21-9#
child: It was like I was in Wonderbird! #00:04:24-9#
parent: Wonderbird? #00:04:26-4#
child: It was like I was in Wonderbird! #00:04:29-1#
parent: Oh, he talked a bit about the emotions. That’s because he watched Inside Out recently. #00:04:34-9#
interviewer: Oh right. #00:04:36-2#
parent: So pressing buttons and the different lights… #00:04:37-9#
child: What’s really the exact same on two reasons! #00:04:43-6#
parent: Yeah? #00:04:44-0#
child: Two reasons! It was like that was inside of a brain… #00:04:49-6#
parent: Uh huh. Like that’s the console inside the brain? #00:04:53-6#
child: Yeah. #00:04:54-3#
parent: Right. #00:04:54-9#
interviewer: I haven’t seen that movie yet. #00:04:56-7#
parent: You should. (laughing) It’s good. #00:04:58-5#
child: Yeah, but also a little bit… And also Bing Bong, one of the characters sacrifices himself. #00:05:12-0#
parent: He does. For Joy. #00:05:13-9#
child: Yeah. #00:05:14-8#
parent: So that the little girl can feel joy. #00:05:16-3#
child: Yeah. Happy. #00:05:18-7#
parent: Happy. #00:05:19-5#
child: Not so the little girl could feel happy. The big girl and grown up. She’s a grown up that can’t feel happy. #00:05:38-4#
parent: Yeah. Yeah. So those lights reminded you of that did it? #00:05:41-8#
child: Yeah. #00:05:42-6#
interviewer: Interesting. #00:05:44-8#
child: Who’s your friend? Bing Bong! (incomprehensible)… power up the rocket! #00:05:54-8#
parent: Yes. _____ hasn’t seen it so he probably doesn’t know the part of the movie we’re talking about. #00:05:58-0#
interviewer: I feel like I’ve seen it now. #00:05:58-8#
parent: Yeah. (laughing) #00:06:00-7#
child: Mummy hasn’t seen it either. Only daddy, me, _____. #00:06:08-8#
parent: I had it described to me. #00:06:09-6#
child: _____, _____, _____, _____ and _____ have all (incomprehensible)… I don’t know which _____ or _____’s dad. I don’t know what _____’s dad’s name is, but I know what his Mum’s name is… _____! #00:06:29-0#
parent: Yup. I don’t know his dad’s name either. #00:06:30-8#
interviewer: Did you have any other thoughts about the tent this time? #00:06:35-6#
parent: _____? #00:06:42-2#
child: You could make a console in there. #00:06:47-2#
interviewer: A what? Sorry. #00:06:48-6#
child: A little console like in Riley’s brain but you’ll need to watch the movie to do that. Then you will know what I’m talking about. #00:07:01-7#
interviewer: If you could make the tent do anything at all, what would you want to do in there? #00:07:07-5#
child: Show a picture of Minecraft when you press green. #00:07:15-1#
interviewer: Draw a picture? #00:07:17-1#
parent: Show a picture of Minecraft? #00:07:18-2#
child: Yeah. #00:07:18-6#
interviewer: Oh Minecraft. On the tent or… #00:07:21-1#
child: Yeah. On the tent. #00:07:22-2#
interviewer: Okay. So it would draw automatically a picture when you press the button or you could draw it yourself? #00:07:30-6#
child: No it would draw a picture automatically when you press green. #00:07:38-0#
interviewer: Okay. #00:07:38-6#
child: (incomprehensible)… whichever one you want. #00:07:44-2#
interviewer: So you play Minecraft a lot? #00:07:46-2#
child: Yeah. #00:07:47-3#
interviewer: You like it? #00:07:48-1#
child: Yeah. #00:07:48-8#
interviewer: Cool. #00:07:49-7#
child: Do you play Minecraft? #00:07:51-7#
interviewer: Only a little bit. #00:07:53-1#
child: Oh. Have you got a stone sword? #00:07:56-7#
interviewer: No. I don’t have a stone sword. You do? #00:08:00-4#
child: Have you made one? #00:08:01-8#
interviewer: No. #00:08:02-3#
child: Have you made an iron? #00:08:04-0#
interviewer: No. #00:08:04-6#
child: Have you made a wooden? #00:08:07-2#
interviewer: No. I haven’t made any swords. #00:08:08-8#
child: What? #00:08:09-7#
interviewer: (laughing) #00:08:11-4#
child: That’s something that you should do in Minecraft. #00:08:14-9#
interviewer: That is something that I should do. You’re right. #00:08:16-4#
child: At least wooden sword, maybe even a stone. #00:08:20-5#
interviewer: What do you think of this as a tent this time _____? #00:00:15-7#
child: Good. #00:00:17-5#
interviewer: Does it, um, do you remember how it was last time? #00:00:22-6#
child: Um it just did random colours. #00:00:26-0#
interviewer: Random colours. Do you think this one makes a bit more sense, is it kind of clearer? Do you like the buttons? #00:00:35-8#
child: Yeah. It would be nicer if it had blue. #00:00:40-1#
interviewer: Blue? So you’d like more colours? #00:00:42-7#
child: Yes, I like the rainbow but my favourite colours aqua and blue. #00:00:48-5#
interviewer: Aqua and blue, that’s very specific. That’s an art child. #00:00:51-8#
parent: (laughing) #00:00:55-4#
interviewer: So, would you like a blue button or do you think there’s another way you’d be able to make colours? Like if you press two buttons at the same time do you think that would be good or you just want a blue button? #00:01:11-9#
child: I want a blue button. #00:01:15-2#
interviewer: You want a blue button. (pause) And this object in the middle, does it look like anything in particular to you? Does it remind you of anything? #00:01:26-0#
child: Reminds me of the tent. #00:01:28-3#
interviewer: Of the tent? #00:01:29-0#
child: (incomprehensible) #00:01:32-6#
interviewer: Because of the door. #00:01:33-7#
child: (incomprehensible) How do we make blue anyway? #00:01:40-7#
interviewer: Blue’s a primary colour isn’t it, there’s no other way of making blue. #00:01:47-1#
parent: Yep. #00:01:47-7#
interviewer: I’m clearly not an art child. (laughing) Did the buttons work the way that you expected them too? Was there any time they stopped working? #00:02:00-8#
child: There was one time. #00:02:04-2#
interviewer: There was one? #00:02:05-1#
child: I pressed green and there weren’t green. #00:02:09-3#
interviewer: (pause) So there was a time where you pressed green and it wasn’t green? #00:02:16-7#
child: And when I pressed two… #00:02:19-1#
interviewer: It goes back to all of them green. #00:02:22-4#
child: (incomprehensible) #00:02:29-3#
interviewer: And so when it stopped working, um, was it frustrating or did you try and, try something else? #00:02:40-0#
child: I tried pushing two buttons. #00:02:42-4#
interviewer: Two buttons. #00:02:43-1#
child: One blue… and then (incomprehensible) (pause) And then when I pressed the yellow button and one came up. #00:03:00-6#
interviewer: (pause) Very good. Did you, do you think anything about this as opposed to last time? #00:03:17-9#
parent: She’s very engaged, yeah. She’s much more engaged. I think it’s (incomprehensible) sort of this there’s more predictability in it so it’s just um, it seems more that it’s not a problem with the puzzle especially so she can figure out so I think she found interesting… and she’s remaining engaged. I think she was tuning out before, like she got frustrated before. #00:03:45-5#
interviewer: With the last interface? #00:03:47-3#
parent: Yeah, even with the very first one there was a wee bit of confusion around it but she liked it but then, she kind of figured it out fairly quickly and lost interest whereas this one I think there’s enough sort of variation in it that she’s interested in what all the different options are. #00:04:03-1#
interviewer: Yeah. #00:04:03-6#
parent: She does like blue so… #00:04:06-8#
interviewer: (laughing) The only reason I don’t have blue in there, is um, the colour, that green button there’s not so much contrast if there’s a blue one, especially when the lights change and there’s a red light and the green button looks a bit blue. #00:04:23-7#
parent: You just – I think this generation of girls, they like blue. #00:04:28-1#
interviewer: Theo’s into purple. #00:04:29-9#
parent: Oh yeah. Yeah. She isn’t in to purple but she just likes Frozen, then animation. Everything in blue after that. #00:04:39-9#
interviewer: (laughing) Um… Is there anything that you wish you could do, other than make blue, is there anything, if you could do anything in the tent… do you have any other ideas about what might that…? #00:04:55-5#
child: Probably if it had every colour. #00:04:57-4#
interviewer: Every colour. Fair enough. So just lots of buttons. (pause) All right. That’s great, thanks. #00:05:12-0#
parent: Did you enjoy it, _____? Did you have fun? #00:05:16-9#
interviewer: Do you remember the last time you came in? Do you remember what it was like last time with the wooden pegs in the holes and then before that there was blocks? #00:00:14-7#
parent: The blocks, I remember the blocks from last time. Do you remember that time before _____? Do you remember last time we were here with the tent? (pause) He’s (incomprehensible) to you. #00:00:27-8#
interviewer: What, what did you think of this object? Did it look like anything in particular? Did it remind you of anything? #00:00:37-5#
parent: (pause) What does it look like? What does this thing look like? This white thing? What does it look like this? #00:00:49-7#
child: (incomprehensible) #00:00:50-6#
parent: Oh good, okay. But what does it look like? #00:00:53-4#
child: It’s like… a tambourine. #00:00:59-1#
parent: A tambourine. #00:01:00-2#
interviewer: Like a tambourine, okay, cool. And you liked the buttons? Yeah? Um, do you, what do you think the buttons do when you press them? #00:01:12-4#
parent: What do they do? #00:01:15-4#
child: They turn the lights on. #00:01:17-4#
interviewer: Yep. Do they turn any particular lights on? If you press the red button as opposed to the yellow button? #00:01:27-4#
child: I was there, that was there. #00:01:31-9#
interviewer: It seems, that he can see, he knows about the colour relationship. #00:01:36-3#
parent: Yeah, yeah he does. #00:01:37-2#
interviewer: So he’s saying it’s not green (incomprehensible) #00:01:39-5#
parent: Yeah, he didn’t go around naming the colours which I thought he would because he knows all his colours but his day care was shocked, cause he was one year old and he knows all his colours (incomprehensible) #00:01:48-7#
interviewer: (laughing) Yeah it’s amazing. #00:01:51-3#
parent: Yeah it’s quite good. #00:01:52-2#
child: This one and that one and this one. That one’s green now. #00:01:59-0#
parent: (pause) Doesn’t bother him now. #00:02:05-7#
interviewer: Do you, do you like the music? #00:02:12-4#
child: (incomprehensible) #00:02:14-2#
interviewer: Do you like the music (incomprehensible)? #00:02:16-7#
child: (incomprehensible) #00:02:16-9#
parent: Another question. One more question. He’s asking more questions. #00:02:19-1#
interviewer: Do you like the music? Yeah? I heard that you’re pretty good at music? #00:02:25-2#
parent: Like to dance. #00:02:29-2#
child: Yeah. #00:02:30-1#
interviewer: That’s good. #00:02:31-9#
parent: This is the final one now? How long have you got to go? #00:02:41-0#
interviewer: Yeah, I’ll try and submit in March. #00:02:43-1#
parent: Okay so you’ve got six months that’s okay. #00:02:45-7#
interviewer: Yeah I’m going to set up one more time to do interviews with design practitioners and I talk about my process rather than doing more studies. Um and I might try to set up a bit of an exhibition. #00:02:57-0#
parent: Okay cool. #00:02:57-8#
interviewer: Which should be nice. #00:02:58-7#
parent: Like, with your stuff, all this? #00:03:02-2#
interviewer: Yeah, like a real process, kind of lay out my (incomprehensible) #00:03:06-7#
child: That was that one, that was that one, that was that one. #00:03:10-0#
interviewer: Is there anything that you wish that you could do in the tent? There’s anything at all that you would like it to do? (pause) No? #00:03:28-7#
parent: Could the tent do anything else? What else could it do? (pause) What’s that? (pause) What do you mean? #00:03:43-4#
child: Just knocking. #00:03:44-6#
parent: Knocking? Oh you’re knocking on it, okay. A little bit complex for him… (incomprehensible) #00:03:51-9#
interviewer: Okay yeah. #00:03:55-9#
parent: I don’t know. #00:03:56-6#
interviewer: That’s okay. #00:03:58-4#
parent: What else can it do. #00:04:02-1#
child: (incomprehensible) that one’s red. #00:04:03-3#
parent: Red, yeah that ones is red. #00:04:06-2#
interviewer: Can you change the light colour? #00:04:11-5#
parent: Can you change the colour? That’s the light, can you change the colour of the light? #00:04:17-6#
child: No (incomprehensible) #00:04:18-8#
parent: You want to show me, yeah show me, please. #00:04:25-6#
child: (incomprehensible) #00:04:26-9#
interviewer: Hey, good one. So you definitely know how it works. #00:04:33-5#
parent: Yeah, oh yes. Do you think it has anything to do with how much kids interact with technology, I know these aren’t technology but they’re basic because he’s very low, he doesn’t, he’s just learnt to, almost three, just learnt how to pick up (incomprehensible) #00:04:54-8#
interviewer: I’m not sure. Um… #00:04:57-8#
parent: I wonder if it comes in to play because I’m always so aware of it, of how kids do stuff based on how much they… #00:05:02-7#
interviewer: I would say pretty much every other kid that comes in here would have been fairly exposed to technology. #00:05:07-4#
parent: They respond differently? #00:05:09-1#
child: (incomprehensible) #00:05:09-9#
parent: Yes I will, I will. #00:05:10-6#
interviewer: My son’s eighteen months and he’s fairly exposed. Um, but he just wants to press anything that looks like a button. #00:05:19-2#
parent: Well yes that’s true, it’s more curiosity than (incomprehensible). Excuse me I’m talking. One minute. #00:05:27-2#
interviewer: All right so… #00:00:06-1#
parent: Is this the second one, or the first? #00:00:08-9#
interviewer: Ah, this is the first video. #00:00:10-8#
parent: Ah yeah. #00:00:11-4#
interviewer: When you came in um, for the first time did you notice it was very different from last time you were here? #00:00:17-4#
parent: What do you think _____? #00:00:19-0#
child: Yes. #00:00:19-7#
interviewer: Yeah? What did you think was different? #00:00:22-2#
child: I think… well I don’t quite remember last time, but it didn’t really have buttons and an igloo. #00:00:33-6#
interviewer: Yep. #00:00:34-6#
parent: Yeah. #00:00:35-4#
interviewer: Did you think that there was a right way or a wrong to use it, or did you think that you just come in and, and play with it however you like? #00:00:46-3#
child: I think just play with it. #00:00:49-6#
parent: Just play with it? #00:00:50-5#
child: Mm-hmm (affirmative). #00:00:51-6#
interviewer: Um, did you think about how the buttons worked when you were playing with it? #00:01:00-0#
child: Well, yeah. Like, if you were on one side the other side wasn’t lit up sometimes and kind of the way you move it when in the middle it was kind of… all the light, I think. #00:01:17-7#
parent: Yeah, we were trying to work that out sometimes weren’t we? #00:01:20-5#
interviewer: So sometimes the lights weren’t up on one side. #00:01:24-9#
child: Yeah. #00:01:25-7#
interviewer: Did you think you figured out how that worked? Or it just happened kind of by itself? #00:01:35-6#
child: I think it just happened, but I think I know how it works you know. #00:01:44-3#
parent: What, what do you… Do you think if you went back in there and we sort of said, “Okay let’s just make it light up on one side” do you think you know how to do it? #00:01:54-0#
child: Yeah. #00:01:54-8#
interviewer: Okay. Did you have a preference for… the… you seemed like you were playing music in there. #00:02:06-4#
child: Yeah. #00:02:07-9#
interviewer: Was that what you were trying to do, or did you just like the lights… #00:02:11-4#
child: Well, I was trying to play music in there a bit, but mum is not very good at it. #00:02:16-3#
interviewer: (laughing) #00:02:19-1#
parent: Yeah, you were making some good tunes. You were having, with hands on both sides, didn’t you _____? #00:02:25-1#
child: Sometimes… [inaudible 00:02:31] (playing with toy) #00:02:29-6#
interviewer: If there’s… if you could have done anything in there at all, is there any, do you have any ideas as to how you would change that space? #00:02:39-2#
parent: Mmm, what do you think _____? What would you do? #00:02:41-2#
child: I would make this long pointy thing with kind of this thing where you went how faster you move the higher it went but you need a tall tent. #00:02:57-0#
parent: Wow. #00:02:58-5#
child: Yeah. #00:02:59-3#
parent: So you mean the faster you press the buttons? #00:03:01-4#
child: Yeah, no, no the… No, you could just like run around you and you try to run and the faster you run around the taller it gets. #00:03:12-1#
interviewer: So there’s something in there that became taller? #00:03:16-8#
parent: That lifted up and changed? #00:03:17-4#
child: Yeah. #00:03:17-9#
parent: Ohh, that’s an interesting idea. (pause) You certainly… the tactility is really great. Is it, you know, it’s very true to… #00:03:29-7#
interviewer: Yeah. I think it is, it’s more successful in the relationship between them, the interaction response. Um, I got through some of the technical issues last time so it’s all working how I designed it to work, um, whether… um, the kids see any meaning in that or not is what I’m sort of interested in. #00:03:56-5#
parent: Yeah, it’s… yeah. I guess, because introducing sound… [crosstalk 00:04:06] Oh was there? #00:04:08-1#
interviewer: There was supposed to be sound last time, it was, it didn’t work properly at all last time. #00:04:11-4#
parent: Yeah, right. So was it music, was it music, was it – ohh, it’s coming back to me – but it was a bit more ambient rather than so responsive… #00:04:19-3#
interviewer: Actually that’s right, I did turn off the notes last time because it was getting false triggers and so it was basically playing all the time. #00:04:26-2#
parent: Ahh, okay. #00:04:27-2#
interviewer: Yeah. Did you have any other thoughts about it this time? #00:04:32-1#
parent: Yeah _____ what do you think? Did you like the igloo? #00:04:34-6#
child: Yeah. #00:04:35-9#
parent: You liked the shape? #00:04:37-1#
child: Yeah. #00:04:38-2#
parent: Yes, Scott’s sort of asking you is there anything else you’ve got to say about it or anything you think he could do to make it, that other kids might like? #00:04:50-2#
child: I think it… what my idea of (incomprehensible) would be like would be good. #00:04:57-3#
parent: (laughing) With the big thing coming up the middle? #00:04:59-8#
child: Yeah. #00:05:00-1#
parent: What kind of thing? #00:05:00-9#
child: A long stick, like… the faster you ran around, um, or stepping around it very, um, the higher it went. #00:05:13-8#
interviewer: So the whole thing would be bigger so you could run around it. #00:05:16-5#
child: On each, on each, on each step. #00:05:19-3#
parent: Do you like the idea of running around in the, in the tent? #00:05:22-5#
child: Yeah. #00:05:23-4#
parent: Yeah? Do you like the tent? _____? Yeah? It’s a cute tent. I like now this echo between the igloo and the tent it’s very… #00:05:34-5#
interviewer: Yeah I’m glad you spotted that. Some people didn’t recognise it’s supposed to represent the space they’re in, which is kind of interesting. #00:05:44-0#
parent: Yeah well it’s sort of, I can see why for some people it’s just an interesting object in itself but they don’t, yeah but it is… #00:05:51-4#
interviewer: It is a little abstract because you’re looking down on something that you’re inside. #00:05:55-8#
parent: Yeah that’s right. #00:05:57-1#
interviewer: So that relationship’s a bit… #00:05:58-4#
parent: Yeah. #00:06:00-0#
interviewer: Um, maybe too abstract for kids. #00:06:02-6#
parent: I think so. Yeah, I think they just take it at face value. #00:06:05-8#
interviewer: Yeah. #00:06:06-4#
parent: Yeah, because until you even said that I hadn’t imagined myself inside. I’d recognised a kind of, relationship of shape but now when you say that I think “oh yeah the colours”, like if I was inside the igloo, the colours penetrate the igloo better. Yeah it’s, yeah, it’s not that instinctive. #00:06:30-3#
interviewer: Yeah, and I think that’s probably the difficulty I’ve had all along is figuring out how to show that relationship. #00:06:41-2#
parent: Yeah, it’s funny that isn’t it. #00:06:42-5#
interviewer: It is a really strange one… #00:06:43-8#
parent: It shows how like, our sense of space… I guess it’s a learned or it gets stuck in certain patterns doesn’t it, like… we don’t relativise our space, you know, we are where we are, we get that from maps too, but you know like a sort of… #00:07:03-2#
interviewer: It’s kind of that Cartesian way of seeing the world I guess, like you’re looking down and that equals that, it’s got a very one to one relationship. Um, so yeah, it will be interesting to see how this one goes. I still think it’s probably more successful than the other interfaces… #00:07:20-9#
parent: Oh I think so for sure. #00:07:22-4#
—
Interaction design and media artist
respondent: Is this yours? #00:00:06-3#
interviewer: This is. Um, okay, so what I might do is … I’ll show you this, because it’s kind of where I finished, and then talk about how I got there. And then, I wanted to ask a few questions about your process, um, particularly in comparison to the way that I sort of stepped through- #00:00:26-1#
respondent: Sure. #00:00:26-5#
interviewer: So… Um, I’d quite like to just get you to interact with it, without me saying too much. #00:00:37-2#
(entering dome space) #00:00:41-6#
respondent: (very long pause in conversation while pressing buttons) That sounds beautiful. #00:03:07-2#
interviewer: So I’ll explain how the system kind of works to you. Are you familiar with Gordon Pask? #00:03:13-2#
respondent: No. #00:03:14-1#
interviewer: He was a cybernetician. Um, sort of in around the early days of cybernetics, and he came up with a work called, “Musicolour,” which was a lighting system that responded to… sort of the output of performing musicians. And it at first would reflect what they were playing like maybe in melody or in tempo, and then it would sort assign colours to different notes and things like that, but at some point the system got bored and it stopped responding, mirroring, mapping the music, and started doing its own thing. And then, it was up to the performers to kind of try and re-engage the system, so whether they copied it or played something else to try and get its interest back. And that’s kind of where I’ve ended up with this. So, when you first start pressing any button, the entire tent will turn that colour. If you stay within the same panel for too long … Oh well, not for too long, but over time it becomes mapped to the position as well. Um, but if you continue on in that panel, at some point it’s no longer mapped at all. #00:04:26-7#
respondent: Oh, wow. #00:04:28-2#
interviewer: It becomes kind of random. What I found that was really helpful with that is that it kind of … When it stopped doing what it expected you to do, the kids really has to re-assess what… how they were controlling the system, and they usually vocalised that or did something physical that I could actually observe. Um, but they didn’t always kind of get to that point. I had this button on the computer, which I call the ‘sabotage’ button and I sabotaged the mapping. Um, and it’s a word that comes from educational psychology. It’s something that they actually do sometimes in autism um, to kind of try and uncover what exactly is going on beneath the surface, so if a kid is interacting in some way, they’re often not verbalising what they’re doing, so they’ll sabotage that play in an effort to kind of encourage them to verbalise it, or you know, some behaviour they can kind of look at. Um, so that’s, yeah, that’s pretty much where the system ended up. Um, and it was pretty interesting – I had one autistic boy who came in and immediately (pressing buttons) realised it was a scale and just went around, and around, and around, and then as soon as I pressed the sabotage button he just sat down, he talked to his mother, he’s like, “you press a button over there, I press a button here,” – so there’s no, there was no way to actually figure out the mapping once it’s sabotaged, but he was attempting to, which was really interesting. #00:06:15-7#
respondent: Hmm. (pause during button presses) So… um… what’s it for? (laughing) #00:06:39-3#
interviewer: At first, when I started this, I was interested in how interactivity can encourage social communication between – the child is in here with their parent, so really the system just facilitates their communication. #00:06:57-7#
respondent: Mmm, it gives them a challenge to collaborate on. #00:07:01-6#
interviewer: Yeah, yeah, exactly. Um, It became a lot more focused – like, social communication is a really big area, and there’s no way I could kind of come out with the data that would support it, so it became more about the way that control, or absence of control, um, motivates certain behaviours or externalises those internal processes I guess. That’s, yeah, that’s kind of what it’s all about. #00:07:33-8#
respondent: So it’s a research tool to learn – to collect data on how parents and children collaborate? #00:07:42-9#
interviewer: Yeah, yep. Um, particularly the way that the child instigates that. #00:07:50-2#
respondent: Uh huh. #00:07:50-7#
interviewer: Um, kind of cooperative play, cooperative interaction, um, joint attention. A lot of those things are quite problematic in autism. Um, the space itself is sort of just supposed to be a calming, welcoming, relaxing sort of space. #00:08:11-7#
respondent: Yeah. #00:08:12-3#
interviewer: When I first started designing it, I was hoping to work within a school. So it’s mobile, it fits in certain rooms and all that kind of thing, but that just never happened, so… #00:08:26-2#
respondent: Uh huh. And the music out there is synchronous, or is that just my confirmation bias? #00:08:37-1#
interviewer: The music is coming from that one over there, yeah. #00:08:39-5#
respondent: There was an orchestral thing that was… #00:08:41-1#
interviewer: The notes play from those buttons, yep. #00:08:44-2#
respondent: Yeah, but there seems like some orchestral soundtrack that was on in the background. Is that just coincidence? #00:08:48-9#
interviewer: Oh, yeah. That was coming from another work, yeah. #00:08:49-9#
respondent: Oh right, yeah, no – It felt like it was… #00:08:52-9#
interviewer: Okay, I might have to turn it down a little bit. #00:08:55-3#
respondent: Yeah, it felt good – I felt like, “Wow, that’s a really nice touch that you mixed in this kind of like-,” because, um, tonally, it was really like consonant with this. I thought, “Wow. Nice detail.” #00:09:10-7#
interviewer: (laughing) This one, the only sort of ambient sound is the water running, and the notes playing, are the sort of feedback. #00:09:21-6#
respondent: Mmm, yeah. #00:09:22-6#
interviewer: Um, alright, well, I’ll show you some of the stages- #00:09:30-0#
respondent: Begin the interrogation. (laughing) #00:09:32-1#
interviewer: Um, this is kind of where I started. This is my honours work. I did a series of devices for a girl with autism. Um, that was kind of just an investigation into the way that her sensory preferences really… So this was kind of like a catch-all device, had lots of different sensory inputs. #00:09:56-6#
respondent: RFID reader. Pressure sensor. #00:10:00-1#
interviewer: Yeah, and a proximity sensor. #00:10:02-1#
respondent: Uh huh. What’s that thing with the coils? #00:10:03-9#
interviewer: It’s EL wire – electroluminescent wire #00:10:07-1#
respondent: Oh, right, yep, yep, so it glows. #00:10:08-4#
interviewer: It turns on as the proximity sensor picks up, yeah. #00:10:12-5#
respondent: As you get closer to it. Cool, nice one. #00:10:13-3#
interviewer: Um, it ended up being sort of vibration that she was most interested in, so I created this 3 joystick device. I tried and separate whether it was the materiality or the vibration that she was into, and it was definitely the vibration, so in the end we created this change table, um, which came from a discussion with her mother who had trouble trying to change her. She was quite active, um, and so if both of those red corners were pressed at the same time it would vibrate, but it was too far apart for her to do on her own, so she had to like, engage with her mum in some way to get it to happen. Um, and that was, like as a kind of research project, it was quite successful. So, um, that’s what got me into the PhD and I was thinking more of a, uh, an environment that would work with different children. Um, so I sort of looked at multi-sensory rooms and Snoezelen rooms, um, and came up with the dome design. Um, and so what I’ve done on the floor is kind of like mapped out my process, so I started with the honours work and went into kind of material explorations, and I did this prototype model which was more of a, I guess a critical design, so the, I wanted to think about what it would be like to have autism, which obviously is impossible to emulate. But the headphones have little microphones on them, so wear them your sense of what you can hear is kind of, it’s a bit out of whack. And I wanted to kind of think about how that would change your interaction if you were kind of being overstimulated by different senses. #00:12:14-5#
respondent: Yeah, distracted. Yeah, cool. #00:12:15-7#
interviewer: The interaction itself was quite basic. At the time I was kind of thinking about how I could make it a narrative space, um, where these kind of lighting changes played out a story, but it, that just became way too complex for what I was after. So, I went into some interface design. The first one was basically a Reactable setup, so with the fiducials. Um, that was too abstract because there was no mapping out of space at all, um, and it wasn’t quick enough either, so it just, the connection between this object and the lighting wasn’t clear enough. Um, I ended up trying this kind of peg-in-hole type interface. It was slightly better, um, but again, I think it was… maybe it was just a tech issue, it just wasn’t quick enough… it had lighting problems coming in through the holes with the camera underneath, um, so that wasn’t hugely successful… #00:13:29-3#
respondent: So you’d recognise spots underneath with the camera. #00:13:31-5#
interviewer: Exactly, yeah. It was a hue camera, um, but if you put a red peg in a hole and the lights turned red, then red light was coming through the other holes. It just became this kind of feedback loop. It was really hard to manage. Um, so in the end, I came up with the model within a model. And the immediacy of those buttons is, I think, what makes that successful. The, it being a dome shape, I think, isn’t so successful, because you’re kind of inside the object you’re looking at. It was kind of a weird… #00:14:12-8#
respondent: Yeah, I like that. #00:14:13-5#
interviewer: I love it as well. #00:14:14-8#
respondent: It’s like a fairy tale. #00:14:15-3#
interviewer: (laughing) Um, but a lot of people didn’t – even adults, when I was just sort of testing it out, they didn’t understand the relationship. #00:14:22-2#
respondent: Wow, that’s amazing! It’s literally like one-to-one. Like, it’s, you couldn’t make it clearer. (laughing) #00:14:31-2#
interviewer: I thought so, but I had asked people – like, even therapists – I brought in psychologists, and they would say yeah, what do they call it? An igloo? They called it, the environment igloo, but they just thought of it as an object, not as a representation of the space. #00:14:46-6#
respondent: Wow. Goodness. There you go – neurodiversity. (laughing) #00:14:51-2#
interviewer: (laughing) Yeah. Again, this is the sort of model I’m working with at the moment. It’s a bit of a mash-up of – this is a cybernetic system of um, a feedback system within another, so this would be the, the um, sort of computer system, this would be the human system, and I’m interested in how their response to goal setting changes when you sabotage their kind of way of measuring the output. This is, um, are you familiar with activity theory? #00:15:31-0#
respondent: Mmm, only vaguely. #00:15:32-7#
interviewer: Okay. Um, so, it’s got a very long history from psychology. Um, and this is just a very small part of it. But basically the subject, which in this case is a person, in looking at the object, which is actually the objective – it’s not a very good term, “object” – um, their motivation is, “How do I make the object I’m sort of looking towards become something else?”. Um, and that’s kind of how I’m connecting these two models. What’s interesting from that theory is something called, “the breakdown”. So if, I’m, it comes into HCI sometimes when people are looking at interfaces, and, and if something doesn’t work out the way they expect it to, the way that they – sort of subconscious actions become conscious to kind of figure out what, why it didn’t work as I expected. #00:16:30-2#
respondent: Right. What would be an example of that? #00:16:31-7#
interviewer: Ahh, the example they often use is something like driving a car. So the actions become something like you learn – your body learns them until something goes wrong, like maybe you’re in an accident or like, nearly hit something, and you kind of suddenly realise where your hands are and how you’re moving all your limbs. Um, and that’s a little bit of what I’m trying to sort of induce through the sabotage. It’s kind of like a breakdown of their interaction. #00:17:05-2#
respondent: So um, and then what feedback have you had from the psychological researchers, in terms of the um, insights they gained through the sabotage? #00:17:22-6#
interviewer: The sabotage, talking to the therapists about sabotage, I haven’t done yet, so I’ll speak to them in the same way I’m speaking to you. Um, I interviewed therapists just in that space, and I was interested in how it would be used within their practice, so didn’t kind of look at my longer process. But I’ll have a couple of them next week, so that’ll be interesting. Just talking about the idea of sabotage with them, it’s um, particularly with occupational therapists, it’s a bit contentious. Some don’t like it, and some do. I like the idea. The word is a bit provocative, um, but maybe it’s not the right word. (pause) This is kind of what I saw when the studies were happening. So we’ve got 3 cameras in there, and just for the sake of exhibition I made a sabotage button. (laughing) #00:18:25-9#
respondent: That’s the sabotage button, yeah. Uh huh. Cool. #00:18:31-9#
interviewer: Yeah. #00:18:33-2#
respondent: Where is that other music coming from? #00:18:37-7#
interviewer: From this one. #00:18:38-6#
respondent: Oh, from in here? #00:18:39-1#
interviewer: Yeah. #00:18:39-4#
respondent: (pause) It’s a great, um, mode. What key is it in or something? It’s got a great musicality. #00:18:56-3#
interviewer: I can’t remember. It’s so long since I, uh… #00:18:58-8#
respondent: Happy? Sad? #00:18:59-9#
interviewer: It all feels a bit melancholy. #00:19:02-0#
respondent: (laughing) I love it. #00:19:04-4#
interviewer: Yeah. (pause) All right, I’m going to check my questions for you. So… what role do participants play in your research? #00:19:22-5#
respondent: Um, I kind of, in some ways they’re collaborators. So, um, the work really only has meaning through the participation of you know, people in the community in it. So it’s a way that the work becomes real, through people’s interactions and experiences of it, of the work. Um, and then, yeah, I guess I think of my work as a way of um, enabling new interpretations of ourselves, our relationship to technology, our relationship to our body, how we imagine our body, or you know, mind-body connections. #00:20:20-8#
interviewer: What, um, where does, does participant feedback come in to your process? Do you take that… #00:20:29-1#
respondent: The, um, I mean, since finishing my doctorate where the data wasn’t there to validate certain questions, I do interviews as a way of um, facilitating this process of reflection. So for me, it’s like the works are opportunities, and kind of provocations or invitations to um, experience connections between things that may normally, habitually, seem disconnected. Um, and then, the opportunity to reflect on that experience it’s a way – it’s like narrative therapy, in the sense that you build this new narrative around a very unfamiliar or novel experience, and then it embeds it. #00:21:10-7#
interviewer: Do you have an example that might seem disconnected? #00:21:16-3#
respondent: Seem dis… oh well, I guess people would think that their thoughts and their physiology can seem disconnected a lot of the time. Um, and then, when they see, for example they start, um… They, in this case of this recent stuff I’m doing with brain waves, when they realise that they can produce this signal when they really mentally quiet, and not thinking of things, and then they start thinking of things and it changes. It’s just like, “But I was just thinking, and thinking is supposed to be not-physical”, but it’s obviously physical enough to pick it up. And then so, just dealing with that, not at a conceptual level, but at an interactive level, where you’re doing these little micro-experiments in your brain and hearing the differences, um, yeah, that’s one of those situations where it’s very much the experiment and um, the challenge, or provocation, in a way, and then as people kind of like, resolve that you know, in their experience of the work it starts to become, “Okay, this is it.” Um, it’s just really for me, it’s about, then, all of these associations come up. Um, and that’s yeah, that’s kind of why I make the work really. It’s just that it can facilitate these new ways of connecting. Um, yeah. So the really, it’s a social process, and I use the audience participation and interviews as a way to just um, amplify that thing that’s already happening in the interaction itself. #00:22:56-7#
interviewer: So do you see the physical artefacts as a kind of end point, or more of a starting point to have these discussions with people? #00:23:07-6#
respondent: Mmm. (pause) The discussions aren’t the end point. Like, the, they’re just a pretty equal part of it. So the talking about it, the thinking about it, but also just the physical experience of the work, the, they’re on equal footing. You can’t have one without the other. But the direct experience they have of the art work, of the lights, the sounds, themselves in that, that relationship, that’s pretty fundamental. Yeah, yep. Otherwise it’s just intellectualising. #00:23:44-6#
interviewer: Yep. (long pause) Um… with, I guess with so much emphasis on their experience and… that feedback, how do you, or do you, even try to measure success of a project? Or even an endpoint of a project? #00:24:17-4#
respondent: Um, when I was doing my doctoral research, I had specific experiential goals in terms of the kinds of experiences and the kinds of reflections that I wanted people to have. And then so I would then do this research and see how that aligned. And then sometimes that would… some things would come up. I said, “I want the experience to be meaningful,” but that’s not something that people can like, respond to immediately. So that was, I had to really think about, “Well, what is meaning? And how do I think about meaning?” So, it was really very useful work in terms of like, re-framing the scope of what you can do with this kind of work and the varieties of meaning that come out of it. Um, so… what was your question again there? I feel like there was another part that I wanted to answer… #00:25:10-8#
interviewer: Just whether there’s an endpoint or a measurement of success? #00:25:13-6#
respondent: Yeah, the measurement of success for me is if I – when I’m hearing people having that, talking about their experience when they’re coming out of it, when I’m looking at the kind of imagery they’re generating from the experience, like when I do the, get them to create maps or drawings. Um, if I, yeah – the measure of success for me is that they’re involved in some kind of process of, um, reflection and experimentation, and usually they are. So, um… I guess, then, if you’re going to talk about success or failure, then I would have to think about situations where it fails. Um… And for me, the situations I find least satisfying is where there’s no human interaction um, in terms of – It’s just like, the show in the galley, where it’s just the iPads there and you just walk up to it. I… find it challenging, you know. I get asked to show that kind of work, and I find it un-rewarding and it’s um, socially really unfocused (laughing), whereas when you have a hosted situation this, there’s a real focusing of attention that I think is really important to the work. Yeah. But the, do I conduct the interviews to find out if it’s working or failing? That’s not really the point. I think the point is really to um, ahh, again, it’s providing an environment where people can really reflect, you know. And the interview and the discussion is just an opportunity to extend that and, and nurture that process of inquiry and reflection. #00:27:03-9#
interviewer: Mmm hmm. What way then does one project inform the next? Do you kind of look for something that’s not kind of fully explored or um, do you start things from scratch? #00:27:25-7#
respondent: I guess, um, partially it’s like born out of – one project might either be a development and a refinement of a previous work, or it might be arising from a frustration, yeah? So, uhh, I was doing those, the Cardiomorphology with the circles for a few years and I thought, “Okay, I want something different to this”, like, for one type of visualisation thing, so I then started exploring these like all-over textures with the Heart Library Project. And that Heart Library Project was also saying, “Oh wow, I’ve done that work with interviewing the audience as part of my research. Now, that was so interesting I want to now experiment with bringing that into the actual practice”, and the audience experience is an integral thing. And then, the major big shift that came then was then the new work with brain waves, and again, that was like well, I couldn’t do that at the time, but um, now I’m bringing it into the work. And then it was like, I was really interested in the challenge of what it would be to create interactions primarily with sound, because people have to have their eyes closed. So how do they progress, one to the other? I don’t know. I mean I, I’ve been working in this area for like about 13 years, and maybe the past 5 years I’ve been wanting to do something around geography and not about the body, but that’s really slow, a really slow process. #00:29:01-1#
interviewer: Just to kind of totally change tack, or…? #00:29:04-9#
respondent: To… no, again, again, it comes from a sense of like, oh I feel a sense of frustration or limitation, and I feel like I need to kind of address the opposite of things sometimes. So, um, there’s such a… in western society we think of the individual as the thing, and our sense of identity is so poorly developed in relationship to its connection with wider systems, so I thought really I wanted to explore geography um, and spatial representation as a way to actually look at those limitations of um, you know, how we see ourselves embodied within wider systems. #00:29:48-6#
interviewer: Okay. Mmm, it sounds interesting. #00:29:51-7#
respondent: Yeah, it just takes a long time. #00:29:54-1#
interviewer: For what reason, other things going on? #00:29:58-3#
respondent: Umm, just because you’ve already got obligations to do certain works and projects, and you want to see them through, and each project you know, it could take 10 years, you know. Um, so you keep lots of things on the go, and you can’t just suddenly drop everything and be like, “Okay, I’m doing geography now,” but um, because you care about all of those other projects as well. Yeah. #00:30:18-6#
interviewer: Okay. Um, I’ve got one more strange question for you. #00:30:27-5#
respondent: A strange question, great. #00:30:29-3#
interviewer: Yeah. So I mapped out how I kind think my process goes on the floor, I guess from early investigations to material studies, prototypes, iterative design, and this is the yet to be finished ahh, interview transcripts. So I was wondering if you would be able to map out on the floor with this chalk something similar, with your own process in mind. #00:30:55-9#
respondent: Right, wow. To the extent that my process aligns with these things I can see here? #00:31:04-1#
interviewer: Ahh, well if they don’t, it would be interesting to hear that as well. #00:31:07-6#
respondent: Mmm. (pause) So my process, wow. Okay, what is my process? (pause) Well, um, I guess the first thing is … it starts with a kind of um… Something somewhere between an intuitive yearning or a desire for a way that things could be connected, yeah? So it would be like, “What if there was a music that was like the sound of my mind or the sound of my mental activity?” #00:31:50-6#
interviewer: Okay, so it’s a bit like a thought bubble somewhere? #00:31:52-9#
respondent: Yeah, yeah, but it’s a feeling bubble really. #00:31:54-9#
interviewer: (drawing thought bubble on ground) Okay. #00:31:59-8#
respondent: Um, and then, I start thinking about, “Okay, well what’s the, what would be the technical foundation for this?” So um, then I start researching the technologies, and hardware, and software. #00:32:18-9#
interviewer: Okay, I’d probably, so that’s material studies? #00:32:21-1#
respondent: Mmm hmm. And then, um… From there, I start building prototypes. #00:32:33-5#
interviewer: Ahh, would these be prototypes that a participant would use? #00:32:39-1#
respondent: Umm, they’re primarily just me … The first stage is me just getting something to work. So I’ll collaborate with an engineer or a you know, a software developer and say, “Can you get this thing to talk to my other tools and processes?” And… then… in the process… I guess simultaneous to that process, I’m also just networking with um, institutions, planting a seed, that I’m doing particular research in a particular area. Um and because I’m looking for them to host and to um, yeah, help facilitate that research. #00:33:32-1#
interviewer: That would be parallel with this? #00:33:34-9#
respondent: Yeah. Yeah, so like at the moment I’m planting lots of seeds with people that I’m interested in geography. #00:33:40-8#
interviewer: Institutions (drawing on ground) #00:33:43-5#
respondent: Mmm hmm. Because they eventually become collaborators, in the sense that they host and produce event – prototyping events, and then full-blown public exhibitions. So involving them in the conversation. Ahh, then, once I get prototyping to a certain level, then I’ll do a prototype exhibition open to the public. And it’s low-key. (laughing) Just a small thing in a small venue usually, just to test out the ideas. And if nothing else, it’s there logistically also to drive you know, myself and my production team to getting something across the line. #00:34:28-4#
interviewer: Okay, that’s… What’re we going to do … Painting. (drawing on ground) Exhibition, yeah? #00:34:39-7#
respondent: Yeah. Um and then, from there … That brings the work to a certain level of um, cohesiveness, in the sense that it can run all day. Um, it embodies certain you know, compositional concepts and things like that. Um, and then really, you have a few of those prototyping exhibitions. And each time it’s exhibited, I’m refining it. #00:35:15-7#
interviewer: (drawing on ground) #00:35:17-6#
respondent: Yep. And then, then what happens? (pause) At a certain point it kind of matures, but I always keep tinkering with it, so every time that I have an opportunity to exhibit at these institution it’s usually always like- #00:35:39-9#
interviewer: So that becomes kind of iterative design? #00:35:42-7#
respondent: Yeah, iterative, yep. But it kind of um, it solidifies at a certain point. Umm… and then, as that’s happening I guess simultaneously new works are being developed. #00:36:00-2#
interviewer: For… for work with participants? #00:36:09-6#
respondent: Mmm hmm. It’s all, it’s all with participants. #00:36:14-1#
interviewer: So I’ve been trying to separate the gallery context from the experiment, is there- #00:36:23-3#
respondent: There’s no separation. I do the experiments in galleries, yeah. So , I mean being at an institution like this it’s fairly new, and I guess that being in a place like this gives me the opportunity to set experiments up, you know, in a way that’s not called an exhibition, but previous to that I have just like, I have exhibitions with galleries and I call them, “laboratories.” (laughing) #00:36:50-8#
interviewer: (pause) Okay, so then I guess the feedback comes- #00:36:58-6#
respondent: The feedback is happening every time I prototype it, beyond getting it working in my studio, that’s where the feedback is coming in. And in that process, that exhibition, it’s conversations. I’m there physically with people listening to them talk about their experience. #00:37:17-9#
interviewer: (pause) Okay, good. That’s interesting. #00:37:31-4#
respondent: (laughing) #00:37:32-9#
interviewer: This was John’s idea. I really like it. #00:37:34-9#
respondent: Uh huh. #00:37:35-6#
interviewer: So I’ll end up with conversations with people, but also a mapping of their process to compare to mine. #00:37:44-8#
respondent: Yep. I mean the thing I’m curious about with your research here is um, ahh, where does this go after a PhD? #00:37:59-8#
interviewer: I, I’d really like to work on a larger scale with psychologists and people who can get some kind of data out of, out of what I’m doing. Whether they’re interested or not kind of remains to be seen. I think they’ve sort of had their doubts when I approached them early on about me pulling this off, um, but as it’s gone along people have kind of been more and more interested. We’ve got an autism research group here, and David Silvera is starting to make some contacts with psychology at main campus and some other institutions. So, um, yeah, we’ll see where that goes. #00:38:45-8#
respondent: Mmm. Cause it’s like the primary audience – it’s not an even an audience – the primary users for this seems to be like psychological researchers, in terms of like um, gathering data on how um, parents and children… #00:39:05-1#
interviewer: Yeah, I mean that… #00:39:06-4#
respondent: …problem solve. #00:39:07-5#
interviewer: …that’s where I was coming from, but I’d just really like everyone’s responses to this, just in an interaction design kind of an experience. It’s, I find that really nice to watch how everyone responds to the change in the way that that system works, um… but it was developed with autistic children in mind. #00:39:33-8#
respondent: Yep. (pause) But it’s very much a laboratory. Um, that’s its home. #00:39:46-2#
interviewer: Yep. I did want to take into like, in situ into schools and get kind of that real world experience, but um, yeah, for a bunch of reasons it didn’t happen. #00:40:01-7#
respondent: But I don’t think it can, it can’t work in that real world situation because they’re not in a position where they undertake those experiments with children. #00:40:10-2#
interviewer: Umm, I guess it depends on how you frame it. If it was just a place for them to come, like a soothing space for them to come through, they kind of do do that. But I suppose me, sitting at the other end of it- #00:40:24-3#
respondent: With the sabotage button. (laughing) #00:40:26-2#
interviewer: …with the sabotage button, like tracking all of their presses and stuff, it changes. #00:40:31-1#
respondent: To me, I think that if you took, if you modified the sabotage element and it wasn’t so much sabotage, but just like um, things get progressively more complex in the mappings, um, that they’re still essentially solvable um, and there’s still underlying logics underneath it, then there’s still the possibility that through cooperation between the parent and child, or child and child, that can then solve it. #00:41:02-4#
interviewer: That’s ultimately where I would have liked to have taken it. That’s kind of the more Pask ‘Musicolour’ end, but I just ran out of time really. #00:41:11-6#
respondent: Yeah, yep, yep. #00:41:13-3#
interviewer: Um and that’s probably some logic that I’d need help with as well. #00:41:19-2#
respondent: But I think the idea of interfaces that um, can only be operated through cooperation is really interesting. I think that’s really powerful. Um and then, looking at how you design the interface, so you know, how that cooperation is embodied in terms of different actions and gestures, and things like that, is really interesting. #00:41:42-2#
interviewer: Yeah. It’s interesting to see how adults approach it, versus children. I mean I’ve, my son’s 18 months and he just mashes buttons. That’s kind of an extreme example, but adults always look for combinations and patterns across the object. They don’t look at buttons individually. And I kind of noticed you doing it as well, looking at it like, “If I press two red buttons together, what happens?” Um, I think kids don’t seem to do that, so I guess there’s some sort of developmental stage. #00:42:12-2#
respondent: Yeah, yeah. And so if you started looking at those patterns as mapped to developmental stages, and then like sequence them somehow or figure out how you transition … What triggers a transition. #00:42:26-8#
interviewer: Yeah. #00:42:28-3#
respondent: (pause) But yeah, it feels really nice in there. #00:42:35-7#
interviewer: Yeah, it’s just a really relaxing space. I’ve had quite a few people comment on that, um, parents of autistic kids, which is really nice to know that that works, just on a, I guess at a material level. #00:42:51-8#
respondent: Yeah. What was that series that was on TV recently … The Prime Minister’s Husband with um, I think, Emma Thompson and one of the guys who was Doctor Who for a while, but basically it’s two politicians and one of the children is autistic, and he has this tent in his bedroom that he climbs into and he retreats into his tent, and like you have to kind of put the food there for him to come and get … He’ll reach out of the tent and go back in, and that’s like his little safe space, which is interesting. #00:43:24-4#
interviewer: Yeah. It’s, I mean everyone is so different. Um, it was a bit of unknown whether they’d feel claustrophobic or secure by the size of the space, but it seems to sit in between those two things. #00:43:40-5#
respondent: Yeah. No the lights are beautiful. #00:43:42-9#
interviewer: (pause) Cool. All right. I might switch this off. #00:43:51-0#
respondent: Great. Thank you. #00:43:51-3#

